logo
Home >
News
> Company news about 10 Tactical Gear Mistakes Operators Keep Making (and How to Avoid Them

10 Tactical Gear Mistakes Operators Keep Making (and How to Avoid Them

2025-08-07

Latest company news about 10 Tactical Gear Mistakes Operators Keep Making (and How to Avoid Them

Whether you’re fresh out of training or have years under your belt, everyone’s made at least a few of these errors. Some are harmless. Others can compromise your effectiveness, safety, or the mission’s outcome.

This list draws on operational feedback, after-action reviews (AARs), and real lessons learned from deployments. Whether you’re a frontline operator or part of the vital support structure that keeps teams supplied, equipped, and mobile, these points matter.

 

1. Carrying Too Much ‘Just in Case’

The problem: Overloading yourself with kit you might not need.

The result: Reduced speed, endurance, and flexibility under fire. Overpacking is a well-documented issue in NATO patrol debriefs.

What to do instead: Apply a layered approach: fighting gear, support gear, and sustainment gear. Keep essentials on your person; everything else can stay in the pack or vehicle.

 

2. Sounding Like a Toolbox on the Move

The problem: Loose straps, rattling carabiners, and gear slapping against your body.

The result: Audible detection, especially in urban and woodland environments. Stealth breaches like this have been flagged in reconnaissance and sniper patrol reports.

What to do instead: Secure all items using elastic retention bands, silencer wraps, and streamlined pouches. Test your kit in movement. Not just while standing still.

 

3. Placing Gear Where You Can’t Reach It

The problem: Poor pouch placement, such as an IFAK (Individual First Aid Kit) on your back or magazines stored in an inconsistent manner.

The result: Slower reloads and delayed casualty treatment. NATO STANAG 2871 recommends that the kit layout match training drills to reinforce muscle memory.

What to do instead: Configure your loadout based on dominant hand, mission profile, and team SOPs. Then train with it in varied conditions—fatigued, gloved, low light.

 

4. Choosing Looks Over Function

The problem: Buying gear for appearance rather than performance.

The result: Fragile materials, poor ergonomics, and untested gimmicks. A common issue in both procurement and personal purchases.

What to do instead: Prioritise field-proven equipment over flashy designs. Gear must be selected based on reliability, not retail appeal.

 

 

5. Ignoring the Weather

The problem: Packing gear based on best-case forecasts.

The result: Cold injuries, degraded mobility, and avoidable discomfort. Notorious lessons from the Falklands and Ukraine underscore the consequences of inadequate weather preparation.

What to do instead: Build your loadout around modular layering. Moisture-wicking base layers, insulating midlayers, and waterproof outer layers are essential.

 

6. Accidental Light Activation

The problem: Helmet or weapon-mounted lights turning on unintentionally.

The result: A compromised position, especially during nighttime movements or in infrared-sensitive environments. This issue recurs in AARs from night operations and exercises, such as NATO Cold Response.

What to do instead: Use lights with lockout switches or shrouded activation. For covert operations, consider IR-only (infrared-only) options with secure covers.

 

7. No Loadout Logic

The problem: Random or inconsistent pouch layout.

The result: Fumbling under pressure, slow reactions, and poor cross-team compatibility. Live-fire instructors routinely flag this in close-quarters and mounted operations.

What to do instead: Standardise placement of critical gear such as tourniquets, radios, magazines. Train until it becomes automatic, and maintain consistency across the team whenever possible.

 

8. Relying on Improvised Fixes

The problem: Zip ties, paracord, or duct tape are used as permanent solutions.

The result: Kit failure under movement, recoil, or weather stress. Improvised solutions are often short-lived and unreliable.

What to do instead: Use proper MOLLE (Modular Lightweight Load-carrying Equipment) retention, clips, and repair kits. If it holds a weapon, med kit, or comms device, secure it with purpose-built solutions.

 

9. Neglecting Maintenance

The problem: Kit is stowed wet, dirty, or damaged after use.

The result: Corroded clips, mould, seized fasteners, and degraded performance. Maintenance neglect is frequently cited in NATO logistics and inspection reports.

What to do instead: Treat your gear like your weapon system. Clean, dry and inspect it after every mission. Replace worn parts and reproof fabrics regularly.

 

10. Building a Loadout for Social Media

The problem: Choosing a kit based on aesthetics rather than application.

The result: Flashy setups that hinder movement, mismatched camo, or low-priority items front and centre. Tactical instructors increasingly highlight this mindset as a liability.

What to do instead: Let the mission dictate the loadout. Focus on fit, function, and field durability, not online appeal.

t. Focus on fit, function, and field durability, not online appeal.