2025-08-07
Whether you’re fresh out of training or have years under your belt, everyone’s made at least a few of these errors. Some are harmless. Others can compromise your effectiveness, safety, or the mission’s outcome.
This list draws on operational feedback, after-action reviews (AARs), and real lessons learned from deployments. Whether you’re a frontline operator or part of the vital support structure that keeps teams supplied, equipped, and mobile, these points matter.
The problem: Overloading yourself with kit you might not need.
The result: Reduced speed, endurance, and flexibility under fire. Overpacking is a well-documented issue in NATO patrol debriefs.
What to do instead: Apply a layered approach: fighting gear, support gear, and sustainment gear. Keep essentials on your person; everything else can stay in the pack or vehicle.
The problem: Loose straps, rattling carabiners, and gear slapping against your body.
The result: Audible detection, especially in urban and woodland environments. Stealth breaches like this have been flagged in reconnaissance and sniper patrol reports.
What to do instead: Secure all items using elastic retention bands, silencer wraps, and streamlined pouches. Test your kit in movement. Not just while standing still.
The problem: Poor pouch placement, such as an IFAK (Individual First Aid Kit) on your back or magazines stored in an inconsistent manner.
The result: Slower reloads and delayed casualty treatment. NATO STANAG 2871 recommends that the kit layout match training drills to reinforce muscle memory.
What to do instead: Configure your loadout based on dominant hand, mission profile, and team SOPs. Then train with it in varied conditions—fatigued, gloved, low light.
The problem: Buying gear for appearance rather than performance.
The result: Fragile materials, poor ergonomics, and untested gimmicks. A common issue in both procurement and personal purchases.
What to do instead: Prioritise field-proven equipment over flashy designs. Gear must be selected based on reliability, not retail appeal.
The problem: Packing gear based on best-case forecasts.
The result: Cold injuries, degraded mobility, and avoidable discomfort. Notorious lessons from the Falklands and Ukraine underscore the consequences of inadequate weather preparation.
What to do instead: Build your loadout around modular layering. Moisture-wicking base layers, insulating midlayers, and waterproof outer layers are essential.
The problem: Helmet or weapon-mounted lights turning on unintentionally.
The result: A compromised position, especially during nighttime movements or in infrared-sensitive environments. This issue recurs in AARs from night operations and exercises, such as NATO Cold Response.
What to do instead: Use lights with lockout switches or shrouded activation. For covert operations, consider IR-only (infrared-only) options with secure covers.
The problem: Random or inconsistent pouch layout.
The result: Fumbling under pressure, slow reactions, and poor cross-team compatibility. Live-fire instructors routinely flag this in close-quarters and mounted operations.
What to do instead: Standardise placement of critical gear such as tourniquets, radios, magazines. Train until it becomes automatic, and maintain consistency across the team whenever possible.
The problem: Zip ties, paracord, or duct tape are used as permanent solutions.
The result: Kit failure under movement, recoil, or weather stress. Improvised solutions are often short-lived and unreliable.
What to do instead: Use proper MOLLE (Modular Lightweight Load-carrying Equipment) retention, clips, and repair kits. If it holds a weapon, med kit, or comms device, secure it with purpose-built solutions.
The problem: Kit is stowed wet, dirty, or damaged after use.
The result: Corroded clips, mould, seized fasteners, and degraded performance. Maintenance neglect is frequently cited in NATO logistics and inspection reports.
What to do instead: Treat your gear like your weapon system. Clean, dry and inspect it after every mission. Replace worn parts and reproof fabrics regularly.
The problem: Choosing a kit based on aesthetics rather than application.
The result: Flashy setups that hinder movement, mismatched camo, or low-priority items front and centre. Tactical instructors increasingly highlight this mindset as a liability.
What to do instead: Let the mission dictate the loadout. Focus on fit, function, and field durability, not online appeal.
t. Focus on fit, function, and field durability, not online appeal.